· Features

CIPD charts how work has changed during the reign of Queen Elizabeth II

The CIPD has analysed how work has changed since the Queen came to the throne in 1952.

The CIPD Work Audit report found there are 29 million people in employment in the UK, 6 million more than in the 1950s, but there has been no increase in the total number of hours worked each week.

The UK has undergone a process of informal 'work-sharing' since the 1950s with a fall of 10 hours in the length of the average working week.

In the 1950s only 4% of people worked part time; 60 years later the proportion is one in four (6.5 million employees).

But the value of output produced by the economy has quadrupled since 1952: the workforce has become much more productive, enabling society to enjoy a much higher standard of living for the same amount of work.

Britons are working much smarter and less hard than in the 1950s, though at present output per hour worked is 16% lower than in France, 18% lower than in Germany and 23% lower than in the United States.

While today's workers are much more prosperous, than those in 1952 there is also much greater inequality. When Elizabeth II came to the throne, the distribution of weekly earnings was almost identical to that prevailing when Queen Victoria celebrated her Diamond Jubilee. In the second half of Elizabeth II's reign the pay gap has "widened markedly", the report reveals.

Although available evidence shows a high overall level of job satisfaction in British workplaces, only a small minority of employees say they would 'go the extra mile' for their employer, while reported rates of work-related stress have increased in the latter decades of the Queen's reign.

The rapid advance of digital information technology in the workplace has created opportunities for greater employee autonomy, including scope to do more work from home, but also resulted in information overload, blurred the boundaries between work and non-work time and enabled more sophisticated monitoring and surveillance of employees.

Whereas 60 years ago more than two-thirds of people in paid work were men - and virtually all men of working age had a job - the male share of employment has fallen to 53%. While the female working age employment rate has risen from 46% to 66% since the late 1950s, the male employment rate has fallen from 96% to 75%.

The number of manufacturing jobs has fallen from 8.7 million in 1952 to 2.5 million at present, the share of manufacturing jobs in total employment falling from over a third to 8%. In the second half of the Queen's reign the share of skilled manuals in total employment has fallen from 18% to 10%. The share of people in managerial, professional and technical jobs - knowledge workers - has risen from 25% to 44%. And the share of people employed in 'personal services' and 'sales and customer services' has risen from 6% to around 16%.

In 1952 there were 9.5 million members of UK trade unions (40% of employees). By 2011 that number had fallen to 6.5 million (26% of employees). It is estimated that when the Queen came to the throne there were only around 20,000 people employed in personnel roles in UK organisations. Today the figure is around 400,000 - a twentyfold increase.

The level of registered unemployment in 1952 (350,000) was only a third of today's corresponding measure (the count of people receiving Jobseekers' Allowance).

In 1952 there were relatively few long-term unemployed. At that time only one tenth of the registered unemployed had been unemployed for more than a year; today the figure is one in six people on Jobseekers' Allowance. Similarly, whereas in 1952 there were three job vacancies for every person registered unemployed, today there are more than three people on Jobseeker's Allowance for every vacancy.

During the Queen's reign a divide has emerged between 'work-rich households' - i.e. with more than one person in a job - and 'workless households.' In the 1950s, the high male employment rate meant that there were very few households without at least one breadwinner. But since the late 1960s, the workless household rate has increased from 4% to 18.8%.

John Philpott, chief economic adviser at the CIPD, said: "In the six decades of Queen Elizabeth's reign, work has continued to be the warp and weft of everyday life. Her Majesty's subjects may devote more of their available time and money to leisure pursuits but even though work has changed in ways that could not be imagined in 1952 the UK still shows no sign of becoming the kind of leisure society predicted by the 'end of work' futurologists of yesteryear.

" Although five years into the Queen's reign as our nation was emerging from post-war austerity the then Prime Minister Harold MacMillan declared that Britain "had never had it so good", the average material standard of living was very meagre compared with what in 2012 we also call 'austerity Britain'. Yet in our more unequal society, with the threat of unemployment an underlying concern even during good times, people do not seem much happier about their working lives and many exhibit the symptoms of work-related stress. Whatever the future of work, the lesson of the past six decades is that increased productivity and prosperity isn't enough to enhance the common good in the workplace or society in general."

Commenting on the report Mark Bull, UK CEO of recruitment firm Randstad, added: "Workers may be more productive today than they were 60 years ago, but there is room and a vital need for improvement. UK organisations surveyed for our World of Work report said that the need to make employees work harder to boost productivity is a top three priority for 2012. But with the downturn in its fourth year, we are seeing a new phenomenon of stagnant talent pools in organisations, where exhausted workers are present but are disengaged and contributing little.

"Our research shows that doing 'meaningful work' under clear leadership is a key motivator which doesn't require significant financial investment. This will help engage and de-stress people, and enable organisations to increase their productivity and attractiveness as a place to work."