Logo
Print this page
Save to disk
Go back

Onboarding: the fast track to staff productivity?

/hr/features/1020702/onboarding-fast-track-staff-productivity

13 Jan 2012, Steve Hemsley, HR

onboarding

But it can be a mistake to cut the time and money spent engaging with new recruits before and after they start.

Why wait until a person's first day to make them aware of the organisation's values, vision and goals - or to explain in more detail their new role, who they will be working with and where?

Regular communication with someone during their notice period will sustain their enthusiasm and expand their knowledge of their new role before their first day. It can also reduce the risk of their being swayed by a counter-offer from their current bosses.

So, as soon as someone says 'yes' to a job, their new employer should think of them as one of their own. And having made the decision to move, the successful candidate wants to feel part of his or her new team straightaway, whatever their notice period.

Unfortunately, employers can take their foot off the accelerator once someone has accepted a job, especially when it comes to senior hires.

According to a survey for HR recruiter Hays Human Resources, 39% of employers are in frequent contact with new senior hires during their notice period. Just half retain 'some' contact, but a tenth admit they have little contact at all between the acceptance letter being returned and a talent walking through the door for the first time.

Barney Ely, director at Hays Human Resources, says: "Companies must not miss the opportunity to start the transition process to a new company early.

"Many organisations also fail to realise the probation period is a two-way process. Employees are deciding whether they want to stay, and the effectiveness of the onboarding process will play a part here."

Increasingly, employers are putting starter packs online, because they recognise in the current climate managers may not have the time they would like to have to spend with a new team member in the first week.

"Give new hires access to employee or team profiles before they start and, if appropriate, invite them to company events, where they might glean useful information," says Ely.

Telecoms giant O2 says onboarding has become more important in its new business areas, where it must attract talent outside of its traditional roles.

HR delivery consultant at the company, Stuart Eynon, says employees are increasingly referring friends or external contacts and it is the personal touch that has the most impact. "We telephone candidates before they start with us, as well as sending postcards and emails. We encourage managers to welcome them on their first day," he says.

Eynon says there are costs to getting onboarding wrong. "If the turnover of new starters goes up, it means higher recruitment costs and a loss of talent. Also, a new starter who leaves because they are disengaged has a negative impact on our internal teams."

O2 is making more use of social media during its onboarding process. It uses the company social network tool Yammer so co-workers can collaborate on ideas, share feedback and ask questions.

"It allows new employees to integrate into the company quicker because they feel part of a community immediately," says O2's head of enterprise innovation, Shomila Malik. "People can get lost in internal processes and not know who to talk to, but with this system they have all the information they need at their fingertips."

Consultancy Capgemini also believes social media is the future of onboarding. Its vice president UK HR, Ann Brown, says sites such as Facebook and Twitter are already having an influence. "Increasingly, when someone accepts a job, they are searching out friends and buddies who they will be working with in their new organisation," she says. "In many businesses, senior people are being given smartphones before they start, so they can hit the ground running and we expect to see more mobile apps relating to onboarding. The whole induction process needs to be made less clunky."

She accepts Capgemini must do more itself to adopt new technology in this area and that the company's existing onboarding process is effective - but very traditional. "We have formal onboarding two days at a time throughout the year, where people learn the background to the organisation, talk about silly acronyms and see presentations by senior people," Brown says. "Ultimately, onboarding must meet both sides' objectives and for us we need people to be effective with our clients as soon as possible. If it takes three weeks from when they join, that is a cost; if it takes three days, because a lot of the work was been done before they start, then that is much more effective."

The onboarding process is moving more and more online and Kenexa Onboarding is a web-based application that integrates with a company's recruitment technology and performance management systems.

Kenexa product marketing manager Sunita Navile believes creating a more efficient online system is particularly beneficial today, when many organisations are recruiting additional agency and part-time workers.

"It is crucial to get onboarding right with this group, to ensure people are engaged - because they could be working at multiple locations and with different employers," says Navile. "HR teams need to look at their induction process for full-timers and adapt it to part-time and agency staff. Some things might be less relevant, but other points may be more important. Some people, such as working parents, have different needs in an organisation, so make sure the onboarding process takes this into account."

When it comes to winning back trust, the banks face an uphill struggle, but onboarding has a role to play here too.

Lloyds Banking Group's group resourcing director, Lindsey Tasker, says the banks have realised they need to be honest about what has happened and not hide the mistakes they have made - if they are to attract the best talent and keep it.

"We are telling new starters that they can help us change as an organisation and be part of something exciting," he says. "This ensures we get the best people. The measure of our onboarding success is whether people feel welcomed, informed and engaged about what we are trying to do."

Tasker is working with HR consultancy Independent to modernise the bank's onboarding process.

Independent's HR consultant Victoria Toomey has helped Lloyds make its onboarding more candidate-led. The bank has pre-joiner internet sites, organises networking events for new recruits and sends out good luck text messages. "The changes being made at the banks and how people are treated when they start will ripple out into the job market," says Toomey.

New starters need reassuring they have made the right decision - and companies never get a second chance to make a first impression.

How firms treat staff before and when they begin work often determines whether they become engaged with the organisation quickly - or not at all.

AmicusHorizon: home truths

Such were the problems with staff morale at housing association AmicusHorizon five years ago that the onboarding process had to be revamped to ensure the best talent was recruited - and stayed.

AmicusHorizon was formed in 2006 by the merger of Amicus Group and Horizon Housing Group and it manages 28,000 homes across the South East, employing almost 1,000.

But, following the merger, the association initially performed badly and was put under regulatory supervision by the Audit Commission in 2007. The company culture was described as 'broken' and the staff across three sites had no confidence in the management or pride in where they worked.

A new management team, led by former Tower Homes chief executive, Steve Walker, arrived with the aim to create a 'one team' philosophy. Onboarding was crucial to this.

Director of HR, Richard Purchase, says the entire onboarding process had to set a positive tone and image for the organisation. "Our evidence is that the more effort you put in pre-start and post-start, the quicker people become engaged, understand the ethos of the organisation and start to perform," he says. "Induction has had to become a more sophisticated process since the merger."

AmicusHorizon now sends out information packs to interested candidates, who are encouraged to find out more during an online tutorial and application process. On their first day, they meet the HR team and their line managers and begin a mandatory series of training modules, which lasts about six months.

"We take very seriously how we interact with people who are applying, whether or not they are successful, because people talk to each other about how they were treated during the recruitment process," says Purchase. "This could help us attract better talent in future."

Lexington Catering: fostering feedback

In the hospitality industry, customer service is king and a strong onboarding strategy can make all the difference.

Corporate food provider Lexington Catering puts all its new starters through a bespoke programme called 'Lex 123', developed by training company Learnpurple. It begins as soon as the recruitment process ends, so a new employee feels part of the team straightaway.

The company is in regular contact before the official start date, informing the new hire of how reference checks are progressing and inviting them to tour the business and meet the key people they will be working with.

The first part of the programme (Lex 1) begins during the first month and explains how the company has been built on its visions and values and what these mean to individual employees. There is an off-site session with other new starters from the organisation's various locations.

Lex 2 is a follow-up group session taking place within three months, to ensure the company is meeting the promises it made as an employer when the job was accepted.

Within six months, the Lex 3 phase begins - a more detailed session on the importance of customer service. Staff learn about customer psychology and talk about their own experiences with clients - good and bad - since they joined.

"In this industry, we must create an environment that inspires people," says Lexington Catering managing director, Julia Edmonds. "We ask for feedback after every session and from the one-to-one meetings, to ensure we are fulfilling our role as employers and that a person's training needs are met early."

She adds that one important measure is the company's staff turnover rate, which is about 15% for junior staff, compared to an industry average of about 45%.

The company uses online 'Talent Toolbox' software provided by Learnpurple for the induction process, which lets employees manage their own needs to ensure they are getting what they require from the HR function.

Meanwhile, the HR team receives key reminders about the stage individuals are at in their probationary period.

 

Reader comments

some more thoughts

"Why wait until a person's first day to make them aware of the organisation's values, vision and goals - or to explain in more detail their new role, who they will be working with and where?"

This was tried and tested with a lot of organizations here. I have talked to a lot of people around who have been internalized like this and not a lot of people were impressed. This is somewhat same with Social Media recruitment style. Success percentage is low. My previous company preferred to recruit more with internal references and strategic vendors. The first comment: Who is going to pay for the period if the involvement period means bench for the person or means interference with the job? Some mentioned understanding of internal processes gave them a scare rejecting the offer. Some mentioned interference with the present role, creating critical roles. At times, what seems ideal may not work and tends to boil into bigger legal issues when mishandled. An article I read, I think US job scenario, risks over-weighed the benefits. Again, it is not measured since this is pretty new idea and has been in place for some high process oriented organizations since some years. What they spend on this unfocused communication and information/ process risk management is larger than benefits? It’s difficult to communicate openly and directly in an ambiguous environment. If you ask me whether I would do it? I would say a 'No'. But yes, I might have a friend or acquaintance over the years whom I would recruit or refer for the right profile, while keeping the person in loop with all major and minor events and processes; over a period of time. Moreover, you will not know companies till you are actually in the rolls. Contracts, Vendors, and Outsiders are always that way with some crucial information not trusted to. I do not want frenemies or competitors in a mask of these to benefit at the cost of mine. Would a director risk this in an Information Consulting or Information oriented company? I have still not found one. There are many such reasons, though some of what I mentioned might be exaggerated or happens in crucial roles. Well, on a funnier but serious note, what my boss once said "Does the HR department have some much time, we can think of cost cutting?" But for sure, seriously, this bosses was one of the best I ever worked under.

Posted by: Ganesh , 13 Jan 2012 | 13:50

some more thoughts

Please forgo the typo. I am sure the following statement is better edited. "Would a director risk this in an Information Consulting or Information oriented company? I have still not found one. There are many such reasons, though some of what I mentioned might be exaggerated or happens in crucial roles. Well, on a funnier but serious note, what my boss once said "Does the HR department have so much time, we can think of cost cutting?" But for sure, seriously, this boss was one of the best I ever worked under.

Posted by: Ganesh , 13 Jan 2012 | 14:04

Onboarding Program

We have grown our non-existent onboarding process (no support, no budget, no resources) to a full-blown, budgeted, and supported program that is not only recognized, but required by senior executives. The key is management participation...er, mandate.

Posted by: Brenda Quinney , 13 Jan 2012 | 17:30

Executive Onboarding Coaching

The biggest reason that new hires fail is a lack of coachability.

The 2012 hiring season is here and 46% of the people about to be hired will fail within the first 18 months on the job. And the real surprise? They're not going to fail for lack of skills; they will fail for lack of attitude.

When new hires fail, 89% of the time it's because of attitude and only 11% of the time because of skill.

Consider that in the U.S., four out of ten newly promoted managers and executives also fail within 18 months of starting new jobs.

Newly promoted or recruited leaders often fail for a few common reasons: due to unclear or outsized expectations, a failure to build partnerships with key stakeholders, a failure to learn the company, industry or the job itself fast enough, a failure to determine the process for gaining commitments from direct reports and a failure to recognize and manage the impact of change on people.

Executive onboarding coaching (of the newly recruited or promoted executive) can turnaround this high rate of failure.

Posted by: John Agno , 13 Jan 2012 | 21:52

Importance of PreBoarding is Key

Great overview with solid examples, thanks! I find it's especially important not to overlook the all important time between offer and start date. A download of info is not necessarily what is key, but creating connectivity certainly is.

I've posted your article to our LinkedIn group, Onboarding Best Practices- Clearing the 90-Day Hurdle and welcome others to join.

www.clearingthe90dayhurdle.com

Posted by: Sue Edwards , 17 Jan 2012 | 03:27

Print this page
Save to disk
Go back