• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Channel Navigation
  • Skip to Information Links
  • Skip to Accessibility Information
HR Magazine LogoHR Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • HR August 2010
  • Features
  • HR Studio
  • HR eBooks
  • Solutions
  • HR TV
  • Forums & Blogs
  • Employee Benefits
  • Learning & Development
  • Employment Law
  • Recruitment
  • HR People
  • Research
  • Technology & Metrics
 
  • Home:
  • Search:
  • Articles:
  • First Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide case goes to court
corporate manslaughter and corporate homicide act

First Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide case goes to court

David Woods, 29 April 2009

 

Be the first to comment on this article

Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings has become the first company to be charged under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.

 

The firm has been charged following the death of junior geologist Alexander Wright who was collecting soil samples in a pit near Stroud and was crushed when the pit collapsed. A director at the company, Peter Eaton, was charged with gross-negligence, manslaughter, and health and safety offences.

 

Steffan Grouch, a partner at health and safety lawyer DWF, believes the case will give organisations a better indication of how the law, and the legal jargon surrounding it, will work in practice. He said: "If the company pleads not guilty, we might see an exploration of what the terms ‘senior manager' and falling far below' in the duty of care actually mean.

 

"On the other hand if it pleads guilty we will still get to learn something, such as how big the fines are likely to be. The sentencing guidelines for the Act have not yet been finalised and the judge will be aware this is the first prosecution and may apply a larger fine."

 

But Grouch admitted because the organisation was a small company, the new law might not make much difference, because under the previous system the individual director would have been the one charged with gross-negligence.

 

He added: "It will be more informative when we see prosecutions of larger companies as here the new Act is likely to make all the difference between acquittal or a conviction."

 

X

You must login to use Clip & Save

  • Print
  • Clip &
    Save
  • News
    by email
 

Share:

  • Bookmark on...
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumble It!
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • DIGG
  • Google
  • Yahoo
 

Your Comment

 
 

To post comments please log in here

 

All Comments

There are currently no comments.

Related Media

Benefits report: Fleet management - Drive safely

More corporate manslaughter convictions expected

More corporate manslaughter convictions expected

Employers advised on how to deal with death at work

Court case reminds employers they could end up in the dock if their staff use mobiles when driving

Aramark sets up parenting classes to help staff with work-life balance

Latest News

NHS Trust not entitled to withhold compensation offered to Trust CEO following C-difficile outbreak

Be prepared to disclose electronic data in bullying and harassment disputes

 
News By Email

Poll

Do you think employers should pay interns some form of wage (other than expenses)?

 

Directory

 

Latest Issue

Latest Issue

September 2010

Is the pursuit of 2:1 degrees undermining diversity?

Interview with TNT's HR bosses

How does the business partnering model work for learning and development professionals?

Subscribe
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Skip to Main Navigation
Haymarket

Haymarket © 1957 – 2010

  • About Us
  • Register
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • News
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Management Today
 
  • Contact Us
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • Newsfeeds
  • Sitemap
  • My HR
  • register
  • Log In