• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Channel Navigation
  • Skip to Information Links
  • Skip to Accessibility Information
HR Magazine LogoHR Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • HR August 2010
  • Features
  • HR Studio
  • HR eBooks
  • Solutions
  • HR TV
  • Forums & Blogs
  • Employee Benefits
  • Learning & Development
  • Employment Law
  • Recruitment
  • HR People
  • Research
  • Technology & Metrics
 
  • Home:
  • Government stands firm on opting out of the 48-hour week Working Time Directive
Government stands firm on opting out of the 48-hour week Working Time Directive

Government stands firm on opting out of the 48-hour week Working Time Directive

David Woods, 03 April 2009

1

1 comment on this article.

The minister for employment relations, Pat McFadden, has rejected a 48-hour week for the UK, labelling it a "bad deal for Britain".

 

The UK has resisted pressure from Europe to remove the right to opt out of the 48-hour week Working Time Directive.

Despite ongoing debate at the EU Conciliation Committee in Brussels over the issue, the UK has held firm against the amendment, which would mean the opt-out to a maximum 48-hour working week, would be phased in within the next three years.

McFadden said: "We have said consistently we would not give up the opt-out and that continues to be the case.

"We argued everyone has the right to basic protections surrounding the hours they work, but also the right to choose those hours.

"Choice over working hours has operated successfully in the UK and in the other member states for many years."

He added: "In the current downturn it is more important than ever people keep the right to put more money in their pockets by working longer hours if they wish. We refused to be pushed into that bad deal for Britain."

But TUC general secretary Brendan Barber thinks the Government needs to put an end to "dangerous long hours working".

He said: "We are disappointed the UK is part of a minority of EU governments that continue to block progress towards ending our damaging long hours culture.

"The health hazards and lack of productivity caused by excessive working time are well proven. And with people being made redundant or reducing their hours, the business lobby's insistence that they still need long hours looks even more out of date."

X

You must login to use Clip & Save

  • Print
  • Clip &
    Save
  • News
    by email
 

Share:

  • Bookmark on...
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumble It!
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • DIGG
  • Google
  • Yahoo
 

Your Comment

 
 

To post comments please log in here

 

All Comments

Dan Hodges - 03 April 2009

Employees should be free to choose how little or much they wish to work. Freedom is a core concept of human rights and so the UK is acting logically.

http://www.outsource3.com

 

Related Media

Britain set to work 48-hour week

Working time opt-out ban is bad news for profits

UK keeps its opt-out from working time regulations

Working Time opt-out decision gets mixed reception from employers and unions

Latest News

Private sector employers urged to brace themselves for discrimination claims following Equality Act in October

CIPD believes points-based migration system is working

Unison to take NHS to court over planned operational overhaul

 
News By Email

Poll

Do you think employers should pay interns some form of wage (other than expenses)?

 

Directory

 

Latest Issue

Latest Issue

September 2010

Is the pursuit of 2:1 degrees undermining diversity?

Interview with TNT's HR bosses

How does the business partnering model work for learning and development professionals?

Subscribe
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Skip to Main Navigation
Haymarket

Haymarket © 1957 – 2010

  • About Us
  • Register
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • News
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Management Today
 
  • Contact Us
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • Newsfeeds
  • Sitemap
  • My HR
  • register
  • Log In