• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Channel Navigation
  • Skip to Information Links
  • Skip to Accessibility Information
HR Magazine LogoHR Magazine
  • Home
  •  
  • News
  •  
  • Features
  •  
  • HR TV
  •  
  • Suppliers
  •  
  • Solutions
  •  
  • Forums & Blogs
  •  
  • White Papers
  •  
  • Employee Benefits
  •  
  • Learning & Development
  •  
  • Employment Law
  •  
  • Recruitment
  •  
  • HR People
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Technology & Metrics
  •  
 
10 March 2010
  • Home:
  • Government told save the DB pension
Government told save the DB pension

Government told save the DB pension

David Woods, 23 January 2009

 

Be the first to comment on this article

Over 1,000 defined-benefit (DB) schemes could be forced to close because of the recession.

 

According to the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), 52% of DB schemes could close as, over the past five months, employers reported they are more likely to make changes to their scheme.

As a result, the NAPF has called on the Government to take the same radical approach towards saving pensions as it is towards banking and small business.

NAPF chief executive Joanne Segars said: "These exceptional times call for exceptional measures and new thinking. We have seen bold action from the Government in response to the crisis in other key areas and similar action is now needed for the UK's pension schemes.

"With so many schemes set close to new members and employee confidence in pensions evaporating, this is a now or never moment if we want to see DB schemes remain a key part of the UK's pension landscape."

But Nicola Bumpus, senior associate at Pinsent Masons, warned it is not a simple process for employers to simply close DB schemes. She added: "Employers should bear in mind that such a change is not always straightforward. The attitude of the trustees of the pension scheme is critical, as it is very likely that the employer will need the agreement of the trustees before the pension scheme can be closed.  

"Employers should therefore consider what powers the trustees have under the pension scheme rules as these will be significant in the negotiation process."

X

You must login to use Clip & Save

  • Print
  • Email
  • Clip &
    Save
  • News
    by email
 

Share:

  • Bookmark on...
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumble It!
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • DIGG
  • Google
  • Yahoo
 

Your Comment

 
 

To post comments please log in here

 

All Comments

There are currently no comments.

Related Media

Employees seek alternatives to pensions

Pensions reforms will mean a bigger role for HR directors

Unhappy pensioners: Government at fault

Regulation sounds death-knell for final-salary pensions

New pensions guidelines are confusing

Pension scheme risk reduction can be counterproductive

Latest News

Exclusive: Westminster City Council publishes salaries of its chief executive and senior offices on its website

i-level redesigns its employee reward communication strategy to reflect its young, innovative image

Think carefully before sacrificing employee benefits for short-term savings

 
News By Email

Poll

Do you think a 21-hour working week will work to tackle issues such as overwork, unemployment, high carbon emissions, low wellbeing, inequalities and sustainability?

 

Directory

 

Latest Issue

Latest Issue

March 2010

Line managers are less critical of HR than they were a year ago - will this continue?

B&Q's HR director explains the company's focus on 18-24 year-olds

Can the science of analytics create super workforce planning?

CSR must be seen as an investment, not a business cost

 

 

Subscribe
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Skip to Main Navigation
Haymarket

Haymarket © 1957 – 2010

  • About Us
  • Register
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • News
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Management Today
 
  • Contact Us
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • Newsfeeds
  • Sitemap
  • My HR
  • register
  • Log In