• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Channel Navigation
  • Skip to Information Links
  • Skip to Accessibility Information
HR Magazine LogoHR Magazine
  • Home
  • News
  • HR August 2010
  • Features
  • HR Studio
  • HR eBooks
  • Solutions
  • HR TV
  • Forums & Blogs
  • Employee Benefits
  • Learning & Development
  • Employment Law
  • Recruitment
  • HR People
  • Research
  • Technology & Metrics
 
  • Home:
  • Flexible Working Torn Up by Mandleson
Flexible Working Torn Up by Mandleson

Flexible Working Torn Up by Mandleson

David Woods, 20 October 2008

1

1 comment on this article.

Government policy was dramatically shredded today after new secretary of state for business Peter Mandleson put the brakes on extending flexible working rights to children aged between 6-16 years. The extension was due to come into effect in April 2009, but has now been halted in order to help small businesses weather the economic storm.

 

The Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development (CIPD) have reacted with dismay at plans to shelve these rights.

CIPD chief executive Jackie Orme said: "This news is spectacularly ill-timed for hardworking families struggling to balance work and family responsibilities, and plan budgets that include substantial childcare costs."

She added: "Government assumes flexible working is a burden for businesses and a charitable extra that can be cut back in tougher times. The reality is flexible working can deliver competitive advantage by improving employee engagement and attracting talented people to organisations that otherwise might remain outside the workforce."

Orme argues employers need motivated part time and flexible workers to survive tougher times.

An estimated 811,000 parents were expected to request flexible working when the extension came into effect

Mandleson has also reportedly postponed an extension of paid maternity leave from 39 weeks to 52 weeks and the creation of an extra bank holiday.

X

You must login to use Clip & Save

  • Print
  • Clip &
    Save
  • News
    by email
 

Share:

  • Bookmark on...
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumble It!
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • DIGG
  • Google
  • Yahoo
 

Your Comment

 
 

To post comments please log in here

 

All Comments

fred innes - 24 October 2008

What makes Jackie Orme think that she knows better than an employer which working patterns work best for their business ?

We have moved on from the 19th century ! Employers are only concerned to deliver a bottom line paying employees to help with this goal. If that could be achieved with flexible working there would be no reason why an employer would resist it.

I think in the current environment having any kind of working pattern will be the challenge for many workers.

 

Related Media

Tough times force mums back to work

Commuting time falls as flexible working increases

Exclusive: Walsh stands her ground on flexible working

SMEs adopt flexible working to beat downturn

The case for flexible working is clear-cut

Exclusive: Tories show their family-friendly face

Latest News

Private sector employers urged to brace themselves for discrimination claims following Equality Act in October

CIPD believes points-based migration system is working

Unison to take NHS to court over planned operational overhaul

 
News By Email

Poll

Do you think employers should pay interns some form of wage (other than expenses)?

 

Directory

 

Latest Issue

Latest Issue

September 2010

Is the pursuit of 2:1 degrees undermining diversity?

Interview with TNT's HR bosses

How does the business partnering model work for learning and development professionals?

Subscribe
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Skip to Main Navigation
Haymarket

Haymarket © 1957 – 2010

  • About Us
  • Register
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • News
  • Features
  • Reviews
  • Management Today
 
  • Contact Us
  • News By Email
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • Newsfeeds
  • Sitemap
  • My HR
  • register
  • Log In