News
David Woods, 22 Feb 2012
Compulsory quotas for women in the boardroom are a key way forward, according to a poll of women’s business networks, carried out by leadership consultancy, White Water Group.
The research presents a view from the ground a year after the Government-commissioned Davies report concluded that companies needed to achieve 25% of women on UK boards by 2015 or face compulsory Government measures.
The poll asked leaders of 30 corporate women's networks, representing more than 10,000 female employees at some of the UK's top firms, what had changed since the Davies report was released in February last year. It reveals that:
Two thirds (66.7%) had seen no change in the opportunities for women in their companies, 80 % think that it will take up to 20 years to reach 30% of women in the executive suite and a further 20% believe it will take even longer.
Two thirds (66.7 per cent) conclude that quotas will be needed to achieve the target of 25 per cent by 2015
This survey suggests women in management don't believe David Cameron's hopes that employers will adopt self-regulation, will be enough.
Averil Leimon (pictured), co-founder of White Water Group, said: "Statistically the proportion of female directors at FTSE 100 companies rose from 12.5% in 2010 to 15% in 2011 but the women we spoke to don't feel that change is going fast enough or far enough. Quotas may be a blunt instrument but they may be inevitable.
"We don't believe, however, that compulsion will be enough to create change and reap the benefits of a more diverse management team. Our survey revealed that many women want more visible involvement from men, who will support the clear business case for more women in senior posts. This means mentoring women, investing in coaching and encouraging more female role models, as well as improving fairness in work practices."
"Getting this right is not just about careers for women; it's essential for the economy as a whole. We've shown that businesses with equal numbers of men and women at the senior management level are more profitable than businesses with predominantly male leaders. What's more, demographic shifts mean that by 2030 the UK will be short of 1.3 million people of leadership age. More women in senior management would address both these issues."
5 comments on this article |
stephen moreton 22 Feb 2012
The increase from 2010 to 2011 is proportionately 20%. If this pattern repeats over for the next 4 years of figures, through to 2015 (incorporating 'compound interest'), the numbers will be up to 24.3% representation. Other factors to consider: - It is likely the more women in senior positions, the more their contribution will be recognised by companies, and the 'way we do things round here' will naturally embrace women's contribution at that level. - More women in senior positions will mean more senior managers with real into the potential contribution of women leaders.
David Pardey 22 Feb 2012
The problem of women on boards will not be solved by quotas, it will simply mask the real problem. ILM research has shown clearly that the biggest problem for women is making the transition from middle into senior management. Without a significant number of women making this transition there will not be enough women senior managers from whom to draw Board members. The challenge for employers is to rethink their talent pipeline so that it doesn't build in an unintentional bias towards men.
fred innes 22 Feb 2012
I have many times seen the comments that claim better performance by companies that have equal male/fermale board or senior mangement representation. However I have not been able to find the research that supports these claims, or similar claims supporting 'diversity'. For example, Averil Leimon states that 'We've shown that businesses with equal numbers of men and women at senior management level are more profitable than businesses with predominantly male leaders'. Where can that evidence be viewed ? Does this equalisation also apply to businesses that have predominantly female leaders ?
Domitianus 22 Feb 2012
Whatever the pros and cons may be, am I the only one to query the validity of a piece of research that asks a special interest group whether they favour measures that will advantage that same special interest group. It's seems a bit like MPs voting on their own pay rise.
Latest Issue - May 2012
The myth of the axolotl is one of nature’s most fascinating.
MA Business & Leisure Limited © Copyright 2012, All Rights Reserved
Send to a friend