News
David Woods, 09 Mar 2011
More than two out of three employers (69%) say they have no effective protection against employees making wholly unjustifiable claims to employment tribunals.
This is a key finding from a survey of employers' experiences of managing workplace conflict, published in the run up to the CIPD conference on conflict management. The Conflict Management survey report shows three in five respondents (61%) have experience of an employee claiming unfair dismissal and 'tagging on' a discrimination claim in the hope of getting more compensation.
Fifty-five per cent say they have endured a complaint against their organisation on malicious grounds. More than half (52%) think the law on unfair dismissal should be amended to make it easier for employers to dismiss. A similar proportion (54%) also support more effective case management to identify 'vexatious' claims, with exactly half supporting the move to require tribunals to award costs against losing claimants.
Mike Emmott, employee relations adviser, CIPD, said: "This survey reflects the strength of feeling among employers about the failings of the current system for resolving workplace disputes. Despite many attempts in recent years to find a solution, the volume of tribunal claims has increased and employers believe they have no protection against weak or speculative claims. "However the survey findings also suggest that recent plans outlined by the Government - to increase the minimum period employees serve before they can claim unfair dismissal from 12 months to two years - will have only limited impact on the number of claims. This is because many claims are linked to discrimination claims which can be made from day one of employment. "The real problem is that the employment tribunal system itself is broken and its costs and benefits are wholly out of line. The Government needs to take a radical look at the existing machinery for protecting employment rights." The survey also indicates a vote of no confidence for the current dispute resolution system. Seven out of ten employers (70%) use compromise agreements to avoid the risk of tribunal claims, with more than half (52%) saying that their use of compromise agreements has increased in the last two years. Also, half of respondents (49%) say their organisation has increased its use of mediation in the last two years .
The number of days management and HR spent on managing both disciplinary and grievance cases has gone up since 2007, the last time the CIPD conducted a similar survey, Managing Conflict at Work: from 13 to 18 days (disciplinary) and from 9 to 14.4 days (grievance).
2 comments on this article |
Peter Copping CFCIPD 22 Mar 2011
Just to ask if the Statistics for Employment Tribunals which are here: (http://www.employmenttribunals.gov.uk/Documents/Publications/ET_EAT_AnnualStats_Apr09_Mar10.pdf. There is reference to later ones in the link, to follow up) bear out Mike Emmett's panic?
Natalie Newton 25 Mar 2011
I know i'm probably biased, but investing in an external hr consultants, getting bespoke policies and procedures in the workplace, and making sure you have all of these documents, are the best protection you can have. Essential HR Partnership are a group of hr consultants that work on a personal basis. We have never had any problems with any of our clients, because where a situation arises, they are quickly advised which route to take. In my opinion, this is the best a business can do in order to protect themselves against employee tribunals. Natalie Newton EHRP www.ehrp.co.uk
Latest Issue - May 2012
The myth of the axolotl is one of nature’s most fascinating.
MA Business & Leisure Limited © Copyright 2012, All Rights Reserved
Send to a friend