Opinion

Blogwatch: engagement

David Woods , 19 Sep 2012

online

Engagement is the crux of the employment contract isn’t it? It should be at the heart of the HR strategy, shouldn’t it?

Not according to William Tincup, writing under the heading Bad HR on the Fistful of Talent blog. He says: “The simple truth is… engagement is a nice to have, not a need to have. We’ve been brainwashed to believe it is our obligation to manufacture engaged employees. Work is not play, play is not work. Our focus on engagement clouds our judgement. Most jobs suck.”

But then get past the rant and he makes a valid point, albeit inarticulately: “Think critically about engagement. Do you really want happy employees? What if they are happy, but they suck? Do you still want them? What’s more important to your organisation: happiness or competence?

Lastly, I’m tired of people pimping out engagement as if it were some super elixir that fixed everything that ails us. It doesn’t. Truth hurts sometimes.”

Phew…

0 comments on this article

Your comment

Click here to comment

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.

In this issue: April 2014
fragment image

Legal aliens: It's law, but not as we know it - would you seek counsel from a big brand?

Fashion forward: SuperGroup's first HRD

Time to celebrate: Flexible working legislation is changing

Health check: Engaging in wellbeing 

MA Business & Leisure Limited © Copyright 2014, All Rights Reserved